June 2015
This issue's contents Current issue Index Search

Letters to the Ethical Spectacle

Spectacle Letters Column Guidelines. Send your comments to me at jw@bway.net. I will assume the letter is for publication. If it is not, please tell me, and I will respect that. I have gotten into the habit of leaving out full names and email addresses; I have had too many people think better of something they said fifteen years ago. If you want your name and email included, let me know. Flames, however, will be published with full name and email address.


Dear Mr. Wallace:

I have just read your essay on lying. Thank you for sharing your words..... I have read it several times and each time, I find myself in a clearer state of mind.


Dear Mr. Wallace:

Mr. Wallace, thank you for that lovely essay on House of Mirth that you posted. I just finally read this novel—having tried first when I was 29, and found “the horror!” and couldn’t finish it; and watched the movie in 2000, but repressed it, as the whole experience was a horror, for other reasons as well as the story; and now, at 61, I could take it. Such a painful story! Your essay gave me a companionable coda. I especially liked your thoughts on Sim Rosedale, as I, too, who am also Jewish, did not mind his old-school depiction at all, and actually found myself chiming in with Edith Wharton on the Jewish gift for evaluation. In the end as you say he was the stand-up guy, and it is touching that I believe no one but he knew about the nobility (wasted in my opinion) of Lily in not using those letters. Jerk Selden was clueless, and I believe Wharton even adds that he knew he needn’t feel guilty, it was just kind of kismet or something. No, it wasn’t, we know, and Rosedale knows. So I felt better to know at last that, as has been my experience, the desired “soulmate” is unworthy and rather like a character in an Idyll of the King who goes galumping off while the person who loves him or her is pining nobly. Anyway, forgive my ramble; your essay was very welcome.

Cheryl