I get four or five letters from strangers on an average day, commenting on something they read in the Spectacle. Most of the mail I get is overwhelmingly positive; most disagreements and criticisms are courteous and reasoned; flames are rare. Email is the main compensation for the effort that goes in to writing and publishing the Spectacle, so keep those cards and letters coming! I will publish your name and email address unless otherwise requested. My address is jblumen@spectacle.org.
Wow, you are still cranking the anti-Newt propaganda. You must fear him greatly. I really enjoyed the way you twisted "unfunded mandates" into something good. You're a sick man. Good writer though. Keep up the fear mongering. It shows you care. It also shows we are winning. Long live the Newt!
Your friend,
Bob Wilson
Good to hear from you.
Newt's ratings in the polls plus the really poor record on getting anything from the Contract through Congress (no term limits, no line item veto, etc etc), Republicans backing off from Newt's environmental position, and other indications make me disagree with your "we are winning."
Here's what I think happened:
The public, viewing the Democrats as weak and distant and Clinton as a dishonest waffler, taught them a resounding lesson in '94.
The public, which is more middle of the road than you or I, now dislikes Newt and feels the Contract Republicans are cutting too much too fast.
If I am right, we'll see the pendulum swing back to the middle in '96.
Stay in touch--it'll be interesting to see who is right on this one.
Why do you have so much hate for Republicans. I care very much about the environment and I am fiscally coservative. I think more americans need to take responsibility for mother nature and stop expecting the government to do everything. The EPA is one of the most abusive and radical groups in Washington. I guess people think a certain way, based on where they get their information. I don't think the republicans are out to do in mother nature. Where will we be with a bankrupt nation if we don't balance the budget?
Walter Scott Robbins walter@rmii.com
I think there is a large group of moderate Republicans in this country many of whom love the environment, and you may be one of them. However, I think the Republican leadership is well to the right of the country, and dishonest as well as extremist in its views.
A group that supports government subsidies via cheap grazing fees, wants to open up more public lands to clearcutting, isn't concerned about toxic wastes, and is promoting the intellectually dishonest "takings" and "unfunded mandates" doctrines is no friend of the environment. You say that you care very much. Did you read my essay on "tragedy of the commons"? How do you address the problem other than through government, given that private financial interests will ALWAYS have an incentive to extract every last dollar from nature?
Michael Medved is by far the worst movie critic on TV, followed only by his accomplice in crime, Jeffrey Lyons. In today's episode of SNEAK PREVIEWS on PBS, those two critics announced a list of their choices for the worst movies of the year. Mr. Medved's #9 choice was 12 MONKEYS!!! I don't know if you've seen that movie, but that is one hell of a good movie;More like one of the BEST movies of the year. I would really have liked to have heard some reasoning behind his decision, but IT'S REAL EASY TO PUT A MOVIE ON A LIST AND NOT EXPLAIN WHY IT'S THERE, ISN'T IT MICHAEL?!?!? And don't think I dislike him just because I liked 12 Monkeys and he didn't...That was just the thing that really set me off. This guy's a psycho-critic, make that hack-REVIEWER, that bashes any movie that contrasts with his view of life. Judging from his praise of crappy kids movies(FOUR STARS to IT TAKES TWO), he would have loved 12 Monkeys if it had actually had 12 cute little monkeys jumping around creating Jumangi-like chaos. Seeing a conservative freak like that on the airwaves just makes me sick, but yet, I watch SNEAK PREVIEWS every freaking time it airs...I just can't get enough opinions of a movie whether I plan to see it or not, no matter what moron is issuing them. Movie Reviewers like Michael Medved and Jeffrey Lyons really make us realize how lucky we are to have CRITICS like Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert.
Rhys Southan MrMaster@iadfw.net
Thanks for writing. I don't watch movie critics on TV (I didn't know who Medved was when I saw his book in my local bookstore). In the papers and mags I read today, there is no reviewer worth the name; in past years, I could sometimes tell that I would like a movie from the way that Pauline Kael trashed it, and vice versa.
In retrospect, my choice of language in the Interview with the Vampire review may have been a bit over the top (the title being the worst offender), but I stand by the ideas I expressed. Though a young girl, as you point out, was one of the protagonists (and numerous readers have written to inform me that she represents Anne Rice's tragically dead young daughter), as always in the movies there is a gap between text and subtext. As I said in my essay in the same issue about rape in the movies, the TEXT may be that something horrible is happening, but the SUBTEXT is that something titillating is happening. Interview with the Vampire may be characterized by some (like yourself) as having a feminist TEXT by portraying a strong female vampire, but the SUBTEXT was pedophilic (come on, an eleven year old girl passionately saying "I want some more"?!!) and misogynist (the girl and every other woman in the movie, including the only other female vampire, died horribly.)
Anyway, when I wrote the review I never imagined I would spend so much time after that discussing a movie I really hated, as opposed to slightly more significant and interesting issues like freedom of speech and world hunger.
I saw 12 Monkeys last night, and really liked it, as I did Brazil and The Fisher King. Gilliam fishes in the delta where sanity runs into madness, quite successfully. However, the Times review I read had me so hyped up I was expecting the best movie of the year, and what I found instead was a dark, interesting puzzle picture that (unlike Brazil) ultimately copped out by explaining everything.
I really enjoyed reading the articles in your thought-provoking Web site. I ran into it on the way to looking for information about sexual violence in film. Specifically, I'm trying to find if anyone has started any movements toward attaching a warning or rating on movies which show explicit rape scenes. I've recently walked out of movies like "Strange Days" and "Leaving Las Vegas" because I couldn't stand the rape.
Do you know any groups who are doing this or might be interested in starting such a movement?
Respond at your convenience,
Paul Bacon - Cone@slip.net
Michael Medved in the book I cited, Hollywood vs. America, lists a number of organizations that monitor morality and violence in films.
Strange Days was pretty horrible, and a good illustration of
what I was talking about in
As a non Jewish person born in a German camp, I need to know that not
only Jews were the victims of the eugenicists.
The most recent reparation settlement by Germany on its victims was made
to Israel. As a non-Jew, my fellow non Jews cannot gain access to this
etnocentric disbursement. Not that money is the question, but
recognition follows. As I understand it, some 36 million non combattents
were exterminated by the Nazis. Who were the other 30 million?
bye
Jim Duffield staffy@omen.com.au
Thank you for writing.
The Holocaust is often presented as a feature of Jewish history.
This has two negative effects: it elbows out the other victims and
it also allows the world to persuade itself that the Holocaust does not
represent a mainstream human dilemma that is capable of repetition.
Jim Duffield replied:
Jonathan,
I'm only too happy for your inclusion of my observation in Spectacle.
You should know that I am an activist for indigenous Australians and
see in my black Australian friends eyes each day the spectre of
genocide that in some ways is ongoing even today. It's quaint and
distressing to note that only a couple of years ago many Australians
deprecated the war crimes trials in Adelaide as being the spectre of
the past "that can never happen again in a modern world." Then
Bosnia.
If genocide is part of the human condition, then I must chose not to
be a homo sapins sapiens, my Staffordshire Bull Terrier deserves
greater respect than my fellow human.
There could be some brother and sisterhood in the Australian genocide
between the Judaic and indigenous communities in our nation to bring
this reality more to the fore in contemporary society. It's a dream,
but it could be a start.
Thanks for your response.
I am still researching my grandparents, Pejsach and
Chana Grynszpan, mostly in order to flesh out
the skimpy details which I was able to register at the Yad Vashem
Hall of Names. Since my family were not in contact, I know nothing
about them personally. The only document that I possess concerning
them is a copy of the deportation orders for the train which carried
them to their martyrdom, bering the signature of Alois Brunner, still
at large. These I obtained from the Jewish Memorial archives in
Paris. This is of course rather sad that I know so little. I continue
to search using the genealogical sources on the net (and "snail
mail"of course).
Yad Vashem's URL is http://yvs.shani.net/
They are not, however, a leading edge web page, as you'll see when
you choose the Hall of Names. They don't explain how to register
someone, nor make it electronically easy, with a form.
Similiarly, they mention that they are "computerising" the records of
deportees for people to be able to search. They don't offer any
electronic access though. Again, during my visit, the search
conducted at my request was done through microfiche, by the
volunteer, who was a willing, but elderly survivor. I was'nt
convinced that the search was necessarily complete.
However, it is a place of pilgramage and I was immensely moved, in a
way that I had not expected, when I realised that my spontaneous
gesture of registration actually represented the only memorial,
tombstone if you like, of my grandparents. No other relative had
apparently done so.
Keep up you good work. May 1996 bring you further success and many
educational breakthroughs with new readers.
Paul Grayson (nee Grynszpan) grynszpan.paul@dial.pipex.com.uk
Just wanted to say thank-you for the stuff I printed from your Internet
site. My 8th grade students will reap the benefits of your years of
compiling and organizing information relating to the Holocaust.
Katherine M. Searle
I have reviewed Auschwitz Alphabet and commend you. I believe it
should be recommended browsing for every school child in the United
States and Europe. Too soon we forget what happened and, because of
this, I fear it will happen again.
As an ISP, with your permission, I will put a link to "Auschwitz
Alphabet" on my page. I would, also, like to mirror the site,
permanently, with your permission, along with my history of the
holocaust, which should be going up soon. Of course, you will get
full credit for all of your work.
Please let me know if you will send me the code for "Auschwitz
Alphabet," so I can mirror the site.
M. Steven McClanahan rescue@snowcrest.net
Steven's email address did not work and my mail bounced back. Steven,
I would be glad to have you mirror the Alphabet--please contact me again.
I discovered your work (Auschwitz Alaphabet) in the Computer
Underground Digest.
It is a very good and interesting subject.
May i ask you where could i connect to get all the picture that are
present in these text ?
Thanks.
Farid BENGRID FBENGRID@DIT.IE
Thank you for your kind words.
I am not sure I understand your question--if you mean where did
I get the pictures I used, I downloaded them from an ftp server
whose address is given in the Sources file--I think it
is called Nysernet.
I would also check the Nizkor Project Web site and the
Israeli gov't server (addresses also given in my Sources file
at the end of the Alphabet.)
Also, I'm writing to inform about a journal I have recently put up
dealing with such issues as why did they do it. Any support will be
greatly appreciated.
We are pleased to announce the opening of a WEB page entitled:
IDEA a Journal of Social Issues.
It can be found at:
http://homepage.interaccess.com/~ajacobs/
IDEA is a journal created for the exchange of ideas related mainly,
but not
exclusively, to cults, mass movements, war, genocide, holocaust, war,
and murder.
The "Reviews" column will be devoted to various works important in
shaping understanding of such things as autocratic families and
groups,
cults, autocratic power, totalitarianism, murder, mass murder,
holocaust and
genocide. These readings fall into two broad categories. 1. The
literature of the
extreme, that is, works that create images, and 2., works of social
science devoted to understanding how and why these systems develop,
broadly social psychology and social commentary.
Original articles will focus on the same themes.
Current articles include:
Authors wishing to submit articles, short pieces, essays or comments
may send them to ajacobs@interaccess.com.
IDEA is published by Krysia Hnatowicz Jacobs and edited by Alan
Jacobs.
Thank you,
I am writing to announce the launch of a web site for the Fortunoff Video
Archive for Holocaust Testimonies at Yale University. The URL is
http://www.library.yale.edu/testimonies/homepage.html
and the site features excerpts of testimonies from Holocaust survivors
and witnesses. Would you please consider adding a link to our site from
your Auschwitz Alphabet?
Many thanks,
L. Christopher Burns
- got that from your uncle's letter. You should sign your
Introduction since you use the first person and it's difficult to know
who is speaking.
After attending the reading from Primo Levi's books I found your
Auschwitz Alphabet on the web and thought that you might be interested
to know of the first public "performance" based on his work has just
started in Cape Town.
It would be nice to be able to download the whole alphabet as one file.
I've downloaded all the pieces. It took a couple of hours from here
and I've saved it to read at home this evening. It is a beautiful
presentation.
The note below is one I sent to friends to encourage them to attend.
With best wishes,
Max Klein, Assoc Prof Paediatrics - University of Cape Town
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Currently at the Castle of Good Hope (British Officer's Mess):
IF THIS IS A MAN
Readings from Primo Levi
by
Christopher Consani
Opened last night for a 2 week run
8.30 pm. Booking at Computicket
Highly recommended. Deserves full houses. Saw it last night. For the
ladies: dress cool - the auditorium is small (80) and no aircon. Book
your seats in the left half of the auditorium close to windows.
Primo Levi was an Auswitz survivor. His holocaust writing ranks with
that of Eli Weisel - but is more restrained.
Powerful impact enhanced by understated and sensitive rendering by
Chris Consani. This is the first public "performance" of any of Primo
Levi's works anywhere. Permission for this presentation was given by
the author's widow. The unusual venue was necesitated by the
conditions imposed by the widow who refuses permission for performances
in any theatre.
Hi Jonathan,
I finally got connected to the Ethical Spectacle and got caught up in your articles on God. I
couldn't resist a response to your philosophizing and searching self-analysis...so here are my
two cents:
You write that you were searching for a loving, forgiving, protective God, and there was no
trace -- perhaps you are looking too far afield for your salvation and joy?? "God" is right
here at home -- in every good deed you do and in every soft, sweet thought that you have.
Look upon yourself with love and "god" will love you. Look upon the world with love and
"God" shall love the world through you.
It seems that so many people seek some unknowable, but loving Creator... I believe that if
people look at their values and assess what they hope to find in "God", they will realize that
they are looking for the human qualities that are labeled "good" -- like hope, love,
happiness, etc. The thing that people may lose sight of is that these attributes are
*HUMAN* -- if there were some all-knowing, all-powerful entity, why do we think that it
could be described as having human attributes. I suggest that perhaps people are looking for
an external (rather than internal to themselves) entity onto which they can place responsibility
for those positive attributes so that they will have a model to live up to and an excuse for
their own failure to do so (e.g., I am not perfect -- only "God" is perfect -or- "to err is
human").
I believe that "bad" things happen in the world when people do not embrace "god" -like
qualities. This unfortunately means that people who do embrace them may get hurt or killed,
and this is tragic. But if we look at the tragedies of our lives and lose our own god-qualities
then we have lost much more than just that -- and society has then undergone a doubly hard
blown. Not only are we selfishly indulging our own anger, we are robbing the world of
another person's worth of "god"liness and all of the manifestations and offshoots that that
entails. The fact is that we create the world around us everyday and our attitudes toward
ourselves and toward others create the only avenue by which we can access the god-qualities
so many of us seek in this life.
Living a moral* and happy life is hard -- it takes guts and will and stamina, things that are
hard to teach and even harder to possess. It means being constantly vigilant against giving in
to the easy path. And it means having self respect and self restraint -- two things that our
consumer culture and our wasteful society do not promote. It requires that we open our
hearts and rely on our stores of courage to believe in ourselves and in our world, to act on
our beliefs, and to be compassionate and kind toward those who do not
share our beliefs.
* by "moral" I mean living up to a set of values and beliefs.
Shannon Spencer
Thanks, Geoff Prior, Ukiah, CA.
The Second Amendment Foundation: http://www.saf.org
Includes many hot links to other sites, including to you.
Jeff Chan's Firearms Archive: http://www.portal.com/~chan/
Very extensive collection of articles. Of special note is his
_Guide to Internet Firearms Resources_, available for downloading
or for following its many hot-links online.
Both of these sites are pro-gun-rights. I'm still looking (so far in
vain) for sites favoring the opposite side.
Best regards, Ken Dowst, Hartford, CT
I was quite startled to hear that the Second Amendment Foundation has
a link to the Spectacle, because none of the pro-gun resources that I
have found on the Net point you to anyone who tells the other side of
the story. Well, it turns out SAF links to my links page, which collects
general resources on politics, law and ethics, though some people probably
find their way from there to my essays on the topic.
In The Million Man March,
you say:
"to repeal the semi-automatic ban and put more guns on the urban streets".
You make similar remarks in some of your other essays, but after seeing it
again, I had to comment. There is no "semi-automatic ban" in effect in
this country. Just what do you think a semi-automatic weapon is? Any
pistol that is not a revolver and any rifle that is not bolt-action is
a semi-automatic weapon. Really, of all legal-for-civilians firearms, only
revolvers, bolt-action rifles, and shotguns are not semi-automatic weapons.
I think what you are trying to say is "assault weapon" or "assault rifle"
ban. Please don't think that I am making a political point -- I'm not. I'm
simply trying to point out that your terminology is in error. If you think
that all semi-automatic weapons should be banned, then tell us that,
but they're not currently banned, and the "assault weapons" (an almost
meaningless term) that are banned are a tiny sub-set of all semi-automatic
weapons.
Brent Krupp fletcher@u.washington.edu
You are correct. I think I used semi because I understand assault weapon
is meaningless.
The more I think about guns, the more the issue really boils down
to finding the middle ground that accomodates the needs of
different communities. Community A wants its guns, and is relatively
peaceful. Community B has nightly gunfire, and its lawabiding citizens
are vastly in favor of keeping guns out of their community. The
criminals from B drive to A, walk into a gunstore with a local friend,
and buy multiple weapons to take back. Community A should want to
help B keep the guns out while preserving its own rights.
B should not need to take A's guns away but should seek its cooperation.
I think it was Virginia that passed a one gun a month rule because
it was embarassed at being the main source of murder weapons for NYC.
I Just can't get over the idiots who buy the idea of gun control. First of all it is
not guns that kill it's people. If all the guns were taken away I guarantee you that
the killers would find another way to kill, ie home maid explosives, home maid blow
guns and bows , throwing knives, and the list goes on for ever!! Any idiot can figure
out that crime isn't controled by taking away the weapon that scares you the most,
because they will replace it with something new. Think of it no guns, I wonder what
technology will dream up next that isn't a gun but can be used to kill in an all new
unsuspecting way. Hey lets make up a law preventing the use of all weapons. The US
national sport would need to be played under strict govt. rules as no one could even
own a bat. kids could not play the games we all grew up with. Food would have to be
prepared in strict govt.agencies as we could have no more knives. Any industry worker
would inevtably loose his or her job as many tools used there could be used as
weapons. Lets raise everyones taxes so we can pay for the regulating of everything
that can hurt us. Well you might as well confine everyone to there place of residense,
and put straght jackets on us all.
How many Trillions of dollars do we have to spend on stupid ideas dreamed up by all
the over activised idiots who think they know the answer. Seems to me there are alot
of politicians who listen to these people and go along with them just to get a vote
and don't care that it costs us to much money. When will they realize that to make
everyone happy is out of our price range! It dose not take a genius to figure this
out.
And you know the answer is right before our eyes. Wouldent it be a lot cheaper
to punish the criminal with what ever means is affordable and effective.Efective
enough that one would think twice about comiting the crime beforehand.It worked in the
past and works in some countries. It's real amazing what a little caining can do to
one who is needing to express himself by commiting a crime.
I also think that taking away our guns is sensless, as I being a law abideing
citizen was offered a .44 mag. Handgun, unregestered with shoulder holster,amunition
and no questions asked, can you believe it? I couldent!! I wonder how easy it would be
for a criminal minded person to find a gun?
I also get a kick in the pants when I hear of these surveys taken in the populous of
a major city. WHAT A CROCK!!! How many hunters do you know in the city. Come to the
small towns and farming comunities where hunting has been a natural tradition since
the begining of time.
Thank you for reading this part of my mind.
Dave AKA alamodem@ycs.ab.ca
In responding to Dave, I noted he is from Canada, which has more gun control
and less murder than the U.S. I sketched out my "keep and enjoy your guns,
but help us keep them out of New York" idea. No reply. Last week, the Times
profiled a woman who lost three sons and a nephew to gunfire in the same New York
neighborhood in the last six years. This is not an uncommon story
here, where small children are also regularly killed
in crossfires. No-one has yet explained to me how putting more guns into
New York will defend a four year old on roller skates from
a bullet in the back.
I will refrain from any comments here, only that I noticed there is no author's name
nor response e-mail address. Curious.
Thank you.
Byron Leger
byronl@hnoc.org
I wrote the article--everything in the Spectacle is mine unless
otherwise attributed.
As you will have noticed from my letters column, I have published numerous
responses, most of them angry, to the article. At this point, I
will publish anything that is well thought out and presents some
new ideas. I am disinclined to run anything that pretty much just
insults my parentage, like some of the mail I have been getting.
No further word yet from Byron....
Thanks,
The Spectacle examines the intersection (or collision) of
ethics, law and politics in our society. It is a monthly
newsletter, available on the Web only. I write all
unattributed pieces myself. Some authors are friends
or acquaintances, while others are people who first wrote
me after reading an issue of the Spectacle. I welcome submissions
on any topic fitting within the above charter, even if I
don't personally agree with the conclusions.
The Spectacle was visited by 30,000 people during December.
I am a business executive and attorney based in New York
City.
I have responded to this and several other similar comments by posting
a bio and mission statement.
Thanks for your interest.
Another human rights web site you might want to include is
Ohio Right to Life, "http://www.infinet.com/~life", which emphasizes
the right to life championed by the Declaration of Independence.
Jay Johansen johansj@afcpo.wpafb.mil
I have a web site--Ethics Updates--that deals both with ethical theory
and with a number of issues in applied ethics, including abortion,
euthanasia, animal rights, death penalty, environmental ethics. If it
looks good to you, I would appreciate it if you could link it.
Many thanks,
i put a link to your page.. i would appreciate if you would put one to mine
if you have the time. my home pages name is Breed's World, but if you do put
the link, you could put Philip Bakelaar, (my name). im only asking because i
hope to have links to resources related to your home page soon.. i thought
your home page was a good place to start though. :)
Philip Bakelaar pbakelaar@exit109.com
My name is Steven Fransblow & I am currently a student at Marianopolis
College in Montreal. I was a participant in the 1994 March of the Living,
a trip that took me to Poland & Israel.
Recently in Montreal there has been a need and call for Marchers to go
and speak to the "non-Jewish community". As part of our outreach
efforts, a homepage on the WWW has been established at
"http://www.bonder.com/march.html".
We are hoping that in the neat future the site will be greatly expanded.
Can you please add this link to your list of Resources?
Thank You
Steven Fransblow
www.apk.net/ucc/
dhunt@igc.apc.org
An Auschwitz Alphabet
Dear Mr. Blumen:
Last month I printed a letter from Paul Grayson of London,
who lost his grandparents in the Holocaust and who recommended a
Yad Vashem Web page. I wrote to Paul for more information, and
he replied:
Dear Mr. Blumen:
Dear Mr. Blumen:
Hello.
Having done a lot of work on Auschwitz, been there many time,
interviewed Lustig, Mueller, Gawalewicz, Klodzinski, Smolen, Kieta
and many more, I am naturally very interested in your site. I find
it very good, very. Also I have hundreds of color photos I took of
both Aus. and Birk. I'd be happy to share these with you. As for
their quality, they have been in several shows including a small
exhibit at the Art Institute of Chicago.
or Yahoo search: =B3Alan Jacobs=B2
Alan Jacobs
Krysia Jacobs
Mr. Blumen:
Manager, Fortunoff Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies
loren.burns@yale.edu
Jon:
mklein@ich.uct.ac.za
A Shaggy God Story
I devoted the October issue to an essay on God, reaching the
conclusion that He probably does not exist and then discussing how
morality can exist without Him. I was startled to get only a single piece of email
in response, while I get scores about my review of Interview with the Vampire.
Possibly there are more Vampire fans than God fans on the Net.
Gun Control
Although its been a while since I last wrote anything on the
topic, I continue to get letters every month. One of these days, I'll
pull all of my gun control pieces together into a single page of
links for accessibility. In brief, I have come to see
gun control as an inter-community relations issue like
pollution. How do you enjoy your pro-gun lifestyle while helping
my community, which does not want them, keep guns out? Pro-gunners
who begin by writing me with regurgitated NRA lists of excuses
like Alamodem's letter, below, never seem to reply once I have
phrased the issue this way.
I am sorry, I too have been searching the net for pro gun
control sites with no luck. I too hope someone has the time
and talent to put together such a site.
prigeo@pacific.net
You asked for additional Web sites on gun control. Here are 2 fine ones:
even more useful than the NRA's site, IMHO.
kdowst@uhavax.hartford.edu
Dear Mr. Blumen:
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~fletcher/
Good Day EH!
The Vampire....Yawn
I would like to know the author and how to contact this person. I have only skimmed
the article. I have downloaded it and intend on composing a response.
Miscellaneous
I looked through your website (drawn by a search on Morgan Freeman-- I liked
the points you made), but couldn't din any statement of what the spectacle is
all about. To be sure, the content speaks for itself, but I'd be interested
in some background--what else do you do with your time, how do you find your
writers, how many hits do recieve, that sort of thing...did I not look in the
right place?
Jim Barton
jxbarton@aol.com
Dear Mr. Blumen:
Dear Mr. Blumen:
Larry Hinman hinman@cts.com
Dear Mr. Blumen:
HTTP://www.exit109.com/~pbakelaar/bw/breed.shtml
Dear sir:
Chair, Outreach Committee, March of the Living
Montreal, Canada
Suggest adding the United Church of Christ Home Page to your
"religious" list.